Welcome to Samuel Yeo Weihong's Mars/Venus blog!

Hello everyone,

On this blog you will get to read my reflections on a NUS module, Mars/Venus?:Gender & (Mis)Communication that I am currently taking. I hope you have as much fun reading as I would have writing this!

You may also want to check out our class' Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/pages/UTWP-MarsVenus/174120595981352

Friday 2 September 2011

My thoughts on ‘Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, Chapter 5: Speaking Different Languages’ By John Gray

Before getting into the details of my reflections, I would like to mention that John Gray’s book, or at least the one chapter that I have read from it has been entertaining. Even though many of John Gray’s examples were oversimplified or generalized, I could instantly relate to the scenarios mentioned by him. In this reflection, I would not be dealing with the reliability of John Gray’s claims but rather the intended effect of his book and the result it had on me. John Gray establishes that men and women are intrinsically different right from the start of his book. He does this by using the “Mars” and “Venus” metaphors to symbolize a polarity of the two genders’ communicative languages. This polarity that John Gray sets up is fitting for the book’s underlying purpose. The purpose of advocating the idea of embracing one’s natural construct. John Gray claims that men and women should not defy their natural form of communication and should only take passive measures to avoid conflict. John Gray makes an excellent attempt to convince his readers that the polarity is true and that the best solution for gender miscommunication lies in his book. He connects with his readers by portraying strong emotions, juxtaposing literal meaning of women’s speech with his supposed correct interpretations and finally by adding depth and drama in his writing. In conclusion, I would say that John Gray was very successful in delivering what he had set out to do. However, the book had little influence on my position on the gender miscommunication issue because I felt that the justification in his book were much weaker compared to other scholarly writings on this topic. Other works on this topic by Deborah Tannen and Deborah Cameron have influenced me greater as they contained evidence that were much stronger and reliable in my opinion.

2 comments:

  1. it's very interesting that Gray could be very effective yet not very accurate. It reflects the strongly attractive nature of his "vision" and expression...exactly what scholars like Cameron and Freed are so worried about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the feedback prof, I find myself analyzing deeper into that inaccuracy when I was doing my summary/reflection piece

    ReplyDelete